' Akasha' ' it is a word very used, for some societies to define you vary things, but that in its mago possesss the same meant: ' ' origem' '. Being that ' ' Akasha' ' can be considered begins it electric that of the origin to all the things; ' ' ter' ' , the fifth essence of cosmo; or, in psychiatry, unconscious the collective one, of where the knowledge acquired for the humanity since the primrdios is stored all. Everything this is not very credvel, to put the nomenclature is good, express good a meaning. As much that can be used as metaphor perfectly in the subject that follows ahead. Seen I finish it paragraph was very obvious for the context that the subject of the text will be about the origin of some thing, but before more deeply entering in this ' ' coisa' ' , we will before try to appraise it. What it is real? How we can define what it is the reality? Yes, we will deal with one of the great pillars of the philosophy, the reality.
If only to appraise the reality as ' ' everything what he is real' ' , we would be ignoring much thing, without forgetting itself to destroy certain definitions. First, if to place what it is real as everything what can be touched, or that it is simply tangible, in this case the concept of ' ' realidade' ' it would be only what the neuro-electrochemical sensors of our brain in action, therefore are they who regulate the tato, that, in turn, would define what she is real? this explains why you vary drunk people had obtained to touch in the famous pink elephant with blue small balls. We can also forget the tangible concept with that famous used religious citation comumente equalizar themselves and explaining the existence of God: ' ' God is as the wind, I do not obtain to see the wind, I I do not obtain to touch the wind, but feel I it in mim' ' (…).